Thomas Daniels
The American ETF market, valued at approximately $8 trillion, largely relies on three key firms. A vital part of this market, the authorized participants (APs) – a specific kind of broker-dealer – have remained limited in number, even with the market’s rapid expansion. These APs are essential for ensuring liquidity and the smooth operation of North American ETFs.
Bloomberg’s examination of over 3,400 fund filings reveals that the majority of ETF flows in the U.S. are dominated by three entities: Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan. These three APs manage more than 90% of capital movements in many funds. Intriguingly, numerous ETFs depend solely on one AP for liquidity, as indicated by the latest comprehensive quarterly data.
For potential Bitcoin ETFs in 2024, this situation poses certain risks. Relying on a few APs could lead to heightened concentration risks in the Bitcoin ETF domain. The volatile nature of cryptocurrencies means the efficiency and stability of these key firms will be closely watched, especially in managing large-volume transactions and ensuring liquidity.
This oligopoly of APs may also affect Bitcoin ETFs’ pricing and availability. Their critical role in controlling cash flow might influence these ETFs’ pricing and trading, potentially impacting investor access and returns.
Significantly, the SEC might consider this concentration while making decisions. The regulator could evaluate the necessity for a more varied AP landscape to foster a stable and secure market, especially considering the unique aspects and potential risks of Bitcoin ETFs.
The SEC has been in discussions with BlackRock and other Bitcoin ETF hopefuls recently, with a possible approval coming in January. The current market buzz is largely due to the expected introduction of Bitcoin ETFs. However, the existing concentration in the ETF sector suggests that the community should brace for possible complexities and challenges in the realm of cryptocurrency-based ETFs.
