Taiwan’s Cautious Approach to CBDC: No Rush, No Timetable

Taiwan’s central bank has clarified that the launch of its central bank digital currency (CBDC) remains distant, as the institution lacks a definitive timetable for the initiative. Emphasizing the inherent complexities, the bank has underscored the importance of meticulous planning and extensive research.

Despite the absence of an imminent launch date, the central bank is committed to public education. This year, it will engage in thorough research, public hearings, and discussions to raise awareness about the potential digital currency.

This cautious approach aligns with global trends. Currently, 98% of the global economy is either investigating or advancing their own CBDC projects. Nonetheless, many countries have raised concerns over the potential increase in governmental surveillance that digital currencies might entail.

Global CBDC Trends and Risks

CBDCs are increasingly capturing global attention, with several nations advancing their digital currency projects. The Bahamas, Jamaica, and Nigeria have fully launched their CBDCs, while 53 countries are in advanced planning stages, and 46 others are actively researching the concept.

Motivations for CBDC adoption vary by country, often focusing on enhancing financial inclusion, improving payment efficiency, and providing a sovereign digital currency. In the Middle East and Central Asia, 19 out of 31 countries are exploring CBDCs to improve cross-border payment efficiency, particularly among oil exporters and Gulf Cooperation Council nations such as Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.

However, the adoption of CBDCs involves careful consideration of potential risks, including bank runs, cyber threats, and complex regulatory challenges related to privacy and anti-money laundering measures. Policymakers must weigh these risks against the anticipated benefits to determine the suitability of CBDCs for their economies.

Notable CBDC projects include Kazakhstan’s digital tenge, which has completed two pilot programs, and the EU’s efforts to establish a legal framework for the digital euro. Cross-border initiatives like mBridge, involving central banks from China, Thailand, Hong Kong, and the UAE, are also progressing through pilot phases.

Despite the momentum in CBDC development, existing digital payment solutions already offer some of the intended benefits. Concerns about data privacy, security, and uncertain adoption rates persist. The future of monetary systems will depend on how central banks navigate the intricate landscape of CBDC implementation.

source