
A growing body of evidence suggests that Bitcoin is shedding its speculative skin and taking root as a legitimate macroeconomic asset. Data from Avenir Group and on-chain analytics platform Glassnode indicates that a substantial share of inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are not hedged, revealing a high-conviction, long-only approach by institutional investors.
This trend marks a structural transformation in how Bitcoin is perceived and utilized by traditional financial institutions.
From Arbitrage to Allocation: A Shift in Institutional Behavior
When the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission greenlit spot Bitcoin ETFs, many observers speculated that the resulting capital influx would be driven by arbitrage—namely, by players exploiting price inefficiencies between spot markets and Bitcoin futures on the CME. However, a new joint study by Avenir Group and Glassnode challenges that narrative.
By applying a rigorous methodology to isolate directional flows from arbitrage-related positions, analysts identified a significant correlation between unhedged demand and ETF inflows. “The data shows a persistent pattern of long-only exposure,” noted Helena Lam of Avenir Group, alongside Glassnode analysts known by the pseudonyms UkuriaOC and CryptoVizArt. This, they argue, signals genuine institutional conviction—not opportunistic capital.
Bitcoin’s Growing Correlation with Traditional Markets
As institutional capital increasingly flows into spot Bitcoin ETFs, BTC is behaving more like a conventional macro asset. The report highlights a growing correlation between Bitcoin and traditional risk-on assets like the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and gold. Conversely, Bitcoin tends to move inversely to the U.S. Dollar Index and indicators of credit market stress such as high-yield spreads.
Moreover, Bitcoin’s sensitivity to global liquidity cycles further cements its macro status. Analysis shows that the cryptocurrency tends to rally during periods of monetary expansion and retrace when liquidity tightens.
A Macro Framework: Bitcoin and Global Liquidity
André Dragosch, head of research at Bitwise Europe, adds another dimension to the evolving narrative. He points to a long-term statistical relationship between global money supply and Bitcoin’s valuation. According to Dragosch, every $1 trillion increase in the global monetary base may correspond to a $13,861 rise in Bitcoin’s market price. While this relationship should not be used for short-term forecasts, it underscores the extent to which Bitcoin has become a proxy for macroeconomic liquidity trends.
The End of Bitcoin’s Identity Crisis
Taken together, these developments signal that Bitcoin’s long-running identity crisis may be nearing resolution. What was once dismissed as a speculative digital asset is now drawing sustained, directional capital from institutional investors. With increasing correlation to traditional financial instruments and responsiveness to global liquidity conditions, Bitcoin is emerging as a bona fide macro asset.
This evolution may usher in a new era of stability, legitimacy, and strategic allocation—one in which Bitcoin is no longer the outsider, but a permanent fixture in institutional portfolios.